La Tomba di Giulio II a Roma: dal rilievo fotogrammetrico alla stampa 3D per non vedenti
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56205/mim.1-2.5Palabras clave:
Photogrammetry, 3D modelling, 3D printing, Tactile, AccessibilityResumen
3D printing artefacts and monuments allows blind and visually impaired people to discover,
understand and enjoy the beauty of Cultural Heritage. The reproduction of the artefacts
usually starts with the 3D survey with reality-based techniques in order to obtain their metric,
accurate digital copy. With a proper post-processing, the digital model is then set up ready for
the printing. The result is a physical model that can be touched and inspected, making the art
visible to everyone.
This paper presents the pipeline followed for the 3D reproduction of the famous Michelangelo’s
Tomb of Giulio II, visible in San Pietro in Vincoli church in Rome. The photogrammetric
survey is descripted and evaluated, and all the process followed to postprocess the 3D model
in order to make it countable for the 3D printing. A particular attention was given to the
problems occurred during the survey (lack of space, lights) and then the postprocessing related
to the creation of different printed physical models. The fi nal models have been printed in
accomplish with the requests of the costumer, in order to make them suitable for blind people.
Citas
Ballarin, M., Balletti, C., and Vernier, P. (2018). Replicas in Cultural Heritage:3D Printing and the Museum Experience, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens.Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 55–62.
Balletti, C., Ballarin, M. (2019). An Application of Integrated 3D Technologies for Replicas in Cultural Heritage, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information,8, 6, 285.
Berjozkina, G. and Karami, R. (2021), 3D printing in tourism: an answer to sustainability challenges?, Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, Vol. 13 No. 6,pp. 773-788.
Fassi, F., Achille, C., Fregonese, L. (2011). Surveying and modelling the Main Spire of Milan Cathedral using multiple data sources. The Photogrammetric Record,Vol.26, pp. 462–487.
Gilardoni, O., (2007). Confronto di applicazioni Image-based e Range-based per applicazioni terrestri, tesi di laurea, Politecnico di Milano, Facoltà di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale e Territoriale, Polo regionale di Como, anno accademico 2006/2007, PDF.
Guidi, G., Remondino, F., Russo, M., Menna, F., Rizzi, A., Ercoli, S. (2009). A Multi-Resolution methodology for the 3D modelling of large and complex archaeological areas. International Journal of Architectural Computing, Vol. 7(1), pp.
-55.
Karbowski, C. (2020). See3D: 3D Printing for People Who Are Blind. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities. 23. Mikhail, E. M., Bethel, J.S., McGlone, J. C. (2001). Introduction to modern photogrammetry,
John Wiley & Sons, inc. Pistofi dis, P., Ioannakis, G., Arnaoutoglou, F., Michailidou, N., Karta, M.,
Kiourt, Pavlidis, G.C., Mouroutsos, S.G., Tsiafaki, D., Koutsoudis, A., (2021) Composing smart museum exhibit specifi cations for the visually impaired, Journal of Cultural Heritage, Volume 52, 1-10
F. Remondino, S. Camapana, eds, (2014) 3D Recording and Modelling in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. Theory and best practices, BAR International Series 2598.
Rossetti, V., Furfari, F., Leporini, B., Pelagatti, S., Quarta, A. (2018) Enabling Access to Cultural Heritage for the visually impaired: an Interactive 3D model of a Cultural Site, Procedia Computer Science, Volume 130, 383-391.
Rossi E., Barcarolo P. (2019). Use of Digital Modeling and 3D Printing for the Inclusive Valorization of Cultural Heritage. In: Karwowski W., Trzcielinski S., Mrugalska B., Di Nicolantonio M., Rossi E. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent
Systems and Computing, vol 793. Springer, Cham. Stoimenov, N., Panev, P., Paneva, M., Karastoyanov, D. (2020) Approaches for 3D Digitalization of Cultural and Historical Sites. Industry 4.0, Vol.5 Issue 5, 243-246
